🌲社論:核能 加拿大的綠色能源🌲

本文翻自澳大利亞金融時報其中一篇社論,並在某些部分略微修改,以讓台灣讀者更加理解文章內容。核能發電作為低碳能源,當今,其發展將因為全球暖化及氣候變遷成為勢在必行。 ---- 以下主文 ---- 在安大略省 2014 廢除燃煤發電前,該省最大城市 —— 多倫多常年籠罩於濃厚的霧霾之中,每年有超過 50 天不宜駕駛車輛。 在正式廢煤後,年度的霧霾天數已降至零。 而其中,加拿大最之名的核工業管理者、操作員及開發人員之一諾曼 · 索耶在這一系列發展功不可沒。 為重新啟用休倫湖布魯斯核電廠四座已封存的反應爐,索耶於 2003 年受聘。該核電廠位於底特律北邊四小時車程的距離。 此後 11 年裡,索耶翻修了布魯斯核電廠,使其 3.2 GW 的裝置量得以併網發電,相當於台中電廠六座燃煤機組的裝置量。 「這是我職業生涯最閃耀的一刻。」62 歲的索耶,於新不倫瑞克省聖約翰市的新辦公室裡的一段訪談中說道。
megapx
多倫多市中心在安大略省將燃煤電廠除役前,常遭霧霾籠罩。 在一場由公衛專家呼籲的轉型中,安大略的電力來源配比從 19% 燃煤下降至零,從低於 1% 間歇性再生能源上升至 9%,從 51% 核能上升至 58%,8% 燃氣提升至 10%,以及自 22% 上升至 23% 的水力發電。 加拿大哮喘協會會長凡妮莎 · 佛蘭在轉型後說道:「儘在幾年前的夏天,不分男女老少,人們總是待在家,好似被囚禁般。又髒又悶的空氣籠罩著整座城市使他們感到懼怕。今天,他們可以因為大幅下降的哮喘風險而享受更高品質的戶外生活。」
megapx
在廢煤後,多倫多的霧霾天數將至近零。 諷刺的是,多倫多的乾淨空氣或許可歸功於提供核燃料,卻禁止使用核能的澳洲。身為全球第三大鈾礦出口國,澳洲提供了核燃料給全球的核電廠。 核電在加拿大獲得廣泛的民意支持。該國是《核武禁擴條約》締約國,且以高標準核工業管理與運作舉世聞名。 在澳洲國會開始討論核能可行性之際,加拿大人也充滿疑惑地看著一個擁有許多再生能源資源,卻仰賴燃煤提供其百分之 75 電力的國家。 索耶說道:「使用潔淨能源帶來的好處是令人感到驚奇的。核能可以解決二氧化碳以及其所帶來的所有健康問題。」 所有的發達國家 —— 包括步入後煤時代,且於兩週前經歷了一百萬戶家庭停電的英國 —— 已開始發現,再生能源最大的挑戰為鞏固可靠的備用能源。 索耶現為加拿大先進反應堆概念公司(ARC Nuclear Canada)董事長。該公司正在設計一個小型發電廠,並計劃將其放置於風電及太陽能廠旁,在後二者停擺時及時補上。 澳洲政府當前的假設為每瓩的風或太陽能裝置,電網亦需要 0.8 至 1 瓩的可調度電力。 一座 100 MW,預估成本約 4.5 億加元(約新台幣 106 億)的反應爐儘需每二十年更換一次燃料,且可在爐芯溫度上升時自動停止運轉。 ARC 正等待取得新不論瑞克省建造小型反應爐的許可,預計可於 2028 年啟用。ARC 的設計可大幅降低核電廠的建造成本,主要因為其儘需約十二分之一的鋼筋水泥,且可於工廠量產,以滿足現代工程的高標準要求。 上述的 ARC 設計為當前全球小型反應爐其中之一。加拿大核安委員會於今年四月收到了第一份建造小型反應爐的申請。該計劃案將在粉筆河建造一個 5 MW 的小型反應爐。
megapx
位於休倫湖,擁有四座重新併網反應爐的布魯斯核電廠。
---- 以下原文 ---- In Canada, nuclear power is green Before Ontario stopped using coal to generate electricity in 2014, the Canadian province's biggest city, Toronto, was enveloped in smog so thick that driving was dangerous more than 50 days a year. Since coal was phased out, the annual smog count has gone to zero. Norman Sawyer, one of Canada's best-known nuclear industry regulators, operators and developers, deserves a lot of the credit. Sawyer was hired in 2003 to bring back online four mothballed reactors at one of the largest nuclear facilities in the world, the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station on Lake Huron four hours north of Detroit. Over the following 11 years the chief nuclear officer refurbished the plant and brought 3200 megawatts of capacity online, the equivalent of rebuilding the entire Loy Yang coal power station in Victoria. "That was one of the proudest moments of my career," the 62-year-old said in an interview from his new offices on a misty North Atlantic morning in St John, New Brunswick. Central Toronto was frequently covered in smog before the state of Ontario shut down coal power stations. James MacDonald In a shift hailed by public health experts, Ontario's electricity generation from coal went from 19 per cent to zero, from less than 1 per cent renewables to 9 per cent, from 51 per cent nuclear to 58 per cent, from 8 per cent gas to 10 per cent, and from 22 per cent hydro to 23 per cent. "Just a few years ago, people of all ages became prisoners in their own homes on hot summer days," said the president of the Asthma Society of Canada, Vanessa Foran, after the shift. "They feared for their health when smothering, polluted air descended upon their city. Today, they enjoy a better quality of life outdoors with a much lower risk of an asthma attack or a trip to the emergency room." After the switch from coal, smoggy days in Toronto fell to almost zero. Wire Ironically, Toronto's clean air is likely to be facilitated, in part, by a country with a nuclear power ban. As the third-biggest seller of uranium, Australia fuels nuclear reactors around the world. Nuclear power has widespread community support in Canada, which is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has a reputation for high standards of nuclear-industry regulation and operation. As the Australian Parliament begins an inquiry into nuclear energy, Canadians look quizzically at a nation with abundant renewable energy yet dependent on climate-warming coal for 75 per cent of its electricity. "The benefits are just amazing when you go to clean energy," Sawyer says. "By using nuclear power you address CO2 emissions and any health issues caused by CO2." All developed economies - including post-coal Britain, where 1 million homes lost power two weeks ago - are discovering that the challenge of the shift to renewables is securing reliable backup. The Australian government is operating on the assumption that for every kilowatt of potential electricity from wind and solar, between 0.8 and 1 kilowatt will be needed from sources that are available at any time. Step in a new generation of nuclear. Sawyer is now president of ARC Nuclear Canada, which is designing a compact power plant designed to be located next to wind and solar farms and to kick in when they aren't operating. At an estimated cost of $C450 million ($500 million) and an output of 100 megawatts, the reactor needs to be refuelled every 20 years and is designed to automatically shut down if the core temperature starts to rise. ARC is going through the process of securing permission to build a reactor in New Brunswick that could be operating by 2028. ARC's design is so much cheaper than regular nuclear plants - which can cost more than $10 billion - because it will use one-twelfth the cement and will be mostly built in a factory, where it is easier to reach the high standards required for advanced engineering. The ARC design is one of many small modular reactors in planning around the world. In April, the Canadian nuclear regular received the first application for one of the plants, a 5 megawatt reactor on Chalk River in Ontario. The Bruce Power Nuclear Power Station on Lake Huron, where four reactors were restarted. Wire
愛心
46
15
全部留言