毫無疑問是把突擊步槍（Assault rifle)
他是是一把發射 5.56 公釐標準彈、具備全自動與三發點放功能、有效射程高達 600 公尺的軍用突擊步槍。配發這種為了在戰場上發揚火力與殺敵而設計的
日內瓦公約第一附加議定書》（Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, 1977）**中有對「民防」（Civil Defence）的專章規定。
根據《第一附加議定書》第 65 條（終止保護）第 3 款的寫明：
「平民防護（民防）人員為了維持秩序或自衛而攜帶輕型個人武器（light individual weapons），不應視為對敵方有害的行為。
在正在發生或可能發生陸戰的地區，衝突各方應採取適當措施，將這些武器限制為手槍（如手槍或左輪手槍）（limit these weapons to handguns, such as pistols or revolvers），以利於區分民防人員與戰鬥員。」
“It shall also not be considered as an act harmful to the enemy that civilian civil defence personnel bear light individual weapons for the purpose of maintaining order of for self-defence. However, in areas where land fighting is taking place or is likely to take place, the Parties to the conflict shall undertake the appropriate measures to limit these weapons to handguns, such as pistols or revolvers, in order to assist in distinguishing between civil defence personnel and combatants. Although civil defence personnel bear other light individual weapons in such areas, they shall nevertheless be respected and protected as soon as they have been recognized as such.”
“2629 Consequently the weapons of civil defence personnel in areas defined above must be restricted "to handguns, such as pistols or revolvers", an expression which does not require comment. The question is whether the equipment of civil defence personnel could not have been limited to this type of weapons in all circumstances. In particular, the preference expressed by some delegates for the use of weapons "such as tear-gas grenades or the various non-lethal riot-control grenades used by the police" (48) for maintaining order led to the rejection of such a solution.”
